As a Learning Designer, I spend the vast majority of my time communicating, collaborating with others - or facilitating them.
In the before times, the long long ago - I used to speak to people in 3D, where we'd share each other's air. How weird does that sound now? It was pretty good. People used to bring in biscuits, and campus was spread out enough you could stretch your legs properly going from meeting to meeting. Now we're 99% remote.
One of the ways I sometimes describe my role is 'facilitating people through a design process'. In practice, this takes the form of facilitating workshops, organising, structuring and facilitating discussions, and being the grease in the design machine between some of the disparate components.
Shortly after I started as Learning Designer, I was fortunate enough to get some great facilitation training from ICA UK, focusing on group consensus facilitation, and structured conversations.
From there I started running Learning Design workshops with the module teams I was working with - modular design 'kick-off' sessions that looked to bring the key authoring and production players together, debate and form consensus - and generally bring everyone in to alignment on how to progress the design of the module. When COVID-19 happened and we were all kicked in to our living rooms, I was able to pivot my practice to remote work pretty much straight away.
I use a range of methods to prod folk along the design journey - be it synchronous meetings, asynchronous presentations and screencasts, 1 on 1 collaboration, good old emails, MS Teams...you name - I'm bothering people via it. This isn't just with colleagues in faculty, but also folk in our hands-on production teams (in particular the Editors) and the fabulous bods in our Learning Systems team - who make all the cool tech tools and toys.
I go in to a specific example of where I've done remote facilitation, collaboration and co-creation in the evidence section below, within 'Learning Designer's induction - collaboration and mapping'.
I do quite a bit of internal dissemination work (for some fun examples, see the 'Introduction to my in-practice video and animation work' part of the Evidence section below), but I think some of the most broadly impactful dissemination work I do is via my little podcast.
I've used it both as a space to learn what good practice looks like, through the lens of applied pedagogy (normally applied in a silly way, for fun), and to draw in experts from across the edu-sphere (in the UK, Canada, and Japan!) to discuss their pet pedagogies, and share thier tips for how to apply them in education practice. It's a long running collaboration between myself, and the fab Dr Mark Childs - and has now progressed to Mark, Professor Rebecca Fergson, Liz Ellis and more writing a book. It's also led directly to me co-authoring a couple of conference pieces and journal papers, linked in the Evidence section below. There's additional evidence on the impact it's had more broadly in my specialist section.
I've been putting some of the technical and speaking skills I've developed through it to use in my role over the last couple of years (often a mile or so outside of my remit, carefully dancing between the toes of others). I've done a bit of voiceover work to accompany the videos and animations I've put together, and have been asked to help share a bit of my podcasting experience through hosting discussions, and helping other teams get started with their own podcasting projects. Externally, Mark and I have together (and independently) run some external seminars, talks and workshops to discuss the benefits of running a podcast (or any kind of collaborative creative endeavour) as part of ones own professional development.
'Communicating with tech' generated by Adobe Firefly
'Introvert' generated by Adobe Firefly
This is a reflection on two parts - firstly around my facilitative work, and then my broader dissemination work.
Here's the runup delivering a typical Learning Design Workshop from my perspective:
Initial cool enthusiasm - 'Cool team, ace, looking forward to it'
Realising it's going to involve facilitating a large group of people - 'Ohgodohgodohgod'
Planning the agenda - 'oh lordy every bit of this needs to be engaging and rock solid'
The run-up - 'I'd best rehearse the whole thing in my head for 48 hours before, to the point where I can't focus on anything else'
The panic - 'what about X tiny detail?! Must overprepare to compensate!'
The delivery - 'Hi everyone! Here's a strange anecdote about a biscuit...'
(it goes well, performance / facilitation mode engages)
Afterwards - 'Oh god X didn't go right, Y didn't seem interested'
After the afterwards - 'Ooh i've just had some lovely feedback from the module team chair'
After that - 'I'm so knackered I need to sleep for a week'
Basically, it's always a bit of event, and while they objectively go well - I find them very, very draining to plan and facilitate.
Left to my own devices, I'm quite happy in my own company. I'm a little shy, and would rather sit down with a good book or quietly tinker with something than go out to and have a rave. I do however seem to have landed myself in a profession where working, communicating, facilitating and collaborating closely with others is the very core of the role. And there's podcasting, not the ideal passion for an aspiring hermit.
Feedback from the sessions I've run has generally been really positive, which has helped allay that feeling to a degree - but it is still something I have to psych myself up for every time. Over the last year I've found that making a conscious effort to prepare a little less has really helped - as have the phrases 'freedom within and framework' and 'liberating structures'. Sometimes being a bit looser and more organic works better for everyone.
The lesson to learn here of course, is that I don't need to worry as much as I do, that I've got the experience to back it up, I've got a performance mode that can engage when needed, things go well when I don't overprepare and relax, and I've had the feedback to prove it. Will the lizard part of my brain learn that lesson though? Nope.
The dissemination side of my practice is probably my favourite aspect of the role. There's a big energetic community of practice for education folk out there, and they're a great bunch to draw on, and in turn share things with. It's fizzy, creative, and helps me connect with the love of the discipline.
I'm also citable which is kind of neat. I never expected to be citable.
It's also the bit I struggle to prioritise in my day-to-day, as the demands of my ever growing and diversifying workload fight with the work that feels more 'self indulgent'. Subsequently, most of it ends up happening in my own time, which isn't really ideal (but as I understand it, isn't uncommon).
Just about all of the dissemination work I show in the evidence section below comes from collaborations - and they're inevitably the ones that help me develop most professionally - and help build the relationships I've come to rely on in rounding out and sense checking my practice. The lesson to learn here of course, is that as this work directly improves my ability to engage in my role, and adds value to my OU work - I should be a whole lot tougher in fighting for a corner of my time to work on things like this - and in cutting the workload cloth I'll accept accordingly.
It's tough though, and something I suspect I'll always struggle with. As you might guess from reading through this portfolio, I have a tendency to get stuck in to a few too many things. Saying that, as I'm now line managing again I'd like to set an example and expectation to my new team, so now is very much the time to get it right. I can tolerate my own personal time being invaded, but I hate the idea of it happening to those I have a duty of care for.
Feedback from Gill Macmillan (Line manager)
Mike is just a great communicator, full stop. And he has a very open, natural and collaborative way of working which immediately puts people at ease. Feedback from Faculty colleagues make it clear just how skilled Mike is at building strong and positive working relationships with module teams – they really engage in his sessions (and enjoy them) and value his expertise hugely. The same is true of his contributions to the Learning Design team itself – he is a regular and insightful contributor to LD team meetings and to our LD team MS TEAMS conversations – offering support, sharing ideas, as well as asking for input and ideas from others. He has also provided mentoring support to new colleagues, and run impromptu sessions to help them get up-to-speed with particular areas of our work. And within the small WELS-facing sub-team of learning designers, he’s a great colleague and he injects a sense of fun (and has been the creative juice in the annual LD Christmas Challenge!). More broadly, his communication and collaborative skills are also in evidence in the wider education community through his postings to the LD Twitter account, and through his Pedagodzilla podcasts which have gathered an impressive following.
Journal of Digital Culture and Education - Paper
Off the back of a fabulous recording session with Jonathan DeHaan and James York around gamification on the Pedagodzilla podcast, James and Jonathan took our discussion to the next level by writing it up in to a brilliant and blistering paper, which has now been published in the Journal of Digital Culture and Education.
My contribution to this was minor, but despite my protestations they insisted on having me down as a co-author, which was frightfully good of them.
So yes, I'm citable - and I couldn't be happier. I'd read more journals if they all read like this - James's writing in particular is spicy, anarchic and entertainingly fighty, while also being an excellently well researched piece of academic writing. When I grow up, I want to be able to work like this.
Journal of Play in Adulthood - Paper
I co-authored this paper with Dr Mark Childs, Dr Jane Secker and Chris Morrison - on how podcasting can be used in professional development. It's a theme I've now presented, or run workshops on both within and without the OU - and one very close to my heart.
The bits where you can distinctly see my fingerprints on this one are in the original research interviews, and on the Intro, Context, Summary and Appendix.
Impact:
https://www.journalofplayinadulthood.org.uk/article/id/1269/
EmpowerED Webinar 7 - Pedagodzilla, and The Power of Playful Pedagogic Podcasting
At this link you'll see a truncated recording of my session at the EmpowerEd webinar series, where I discussed the power of playful pedagogic podcasting. It went really well!
Impact: I actually discuss the impact it's had on my persona development as part of the video - feel free to skip to the 13 minute mark if you're interested!
Learning Designer's induction - collaboration and mapping
In the associated case study (linked), I go into detail about the collaborative process used to design our new team member induction, which I part-facilitated. The screenshot below is taken from the student journey (also sometimes called module mapping) exercise, and shows the result of two blistering sessions of taking our existing induction thinking to pieces, carving it up and sticking it back together again in a way that a) made more sense and b) better matched VLE delivery combined with flipped classroom 'tutorials'. As you can see from the screenshot, we opted for Miro as our collaborative space to build this.
Impact: The impact is twofold, through some great collaboration with a small but bang on members of the team we managed to pull together a really complex and comprehensive induction in to something that people could actually go to and study. This wasn't at the top of our priority list and had to happen in the peripheries of our time, so I'm incredibly chuffed that we managed to follow through on a good design and planning process to build the end product. Part of this was drawing in a new, and incredibly talented member of the team, who was able to draw in her own 'new starter' perspectives, and help take the temperature of the other new starters, and the pain points they were experiencing.
The impact on new team members has been great as well, with the half dozen or so folk who've used it so far reportedly finding it a good way to get started, with lots of authentic activities to prompt them out of their shells and speaking to people. An unexpected benefit is that apparently it's serving well as an unnofficial manual for the role, with folk returning to it to check aspects of the role.
Group facilitation feedback from academic author
This feedback came from a session I recently facilitated, reviewing the constructive alignment of a module remake. The team were brilliantly engaged, which meant we managed to back-map the who module from the first assessment backwards in under and hour. Very chuffed.
Evidence of group facilitation (in person) - module mapping
In the example below (in the before times, the long long ago) I worked with a module team for a morning to look at the opening weeks of their upcoming module, where it sat in the curriculum, and how the assessment structure was going to work.
This was a great session, with me running up and down the board, placing, writing and moving Postits as the team figured out the structure of these opening weeks - with me providing some challenging questions as we went.
Introduction to my in-practice video and animation work
In this video, I give you a quick overview of the breadth of video and animation work I do, for both my own and team communications and training.
I'm a bit of a shy fellow, so everyone working from home has been a great opportunity for me to really amp up the asynchronous communication methods. Videos have been a really big winner, and I've had great feedback from within and without my team - particularly when it means people don't have to sit through a presentation in a formal meeting!
I'm getting quicker at producing these now as well. Most are done on the first take - and it's often quicker than writing an email. Result.
Example of using screencasts to communicate
In this short video I outline an approach a small team of us can use to break up a large, complex piece of qualitative analysis in to manageable chunks. I opted for a screencast with some accompanying scribbles because I've found that the accompanying scrappy visual model seems to really help people grasp these somewhat fiddly abstract constructs. It's also a preferably alternative to me setting up a meeting and performing the same, as everyone's calendars are so nightmarish that it makes much more sense to do anything asynchronously that we can.
ICA Facilitation and discussion training
I'm going to level with you - I can't find a certificate for this. I can tell you it was a two day course, 27th-28th November 2018 - and was pretty good fun. In it's place, I've put this probably nearly not quite authentic certificate.
(Update January 2022 - It turns out we didn't actually get a certificate for this.)
Panel hosting
There's a recording of the panel discussion I ran for our recent Diversity week. It was a bit daunting to put the podcasting face on in a professional context - but very rewarding for it.
Following on from this, one of the participants contacted me as 'facilitator extraordinaire', which was frightfully good of them.
A commitment to exploring and understanding the interplay between technology and learning
Uses online meeting technology to enable and facilitate distance and asynchronous collaboration and communication
An empathy with and willingness to learn from colleagues from different backgrounds and specialist options
Responds to participant feedback, and uses this to inform future practice
A commitment to communicate and disseminate effective practice
Communicates, facilitates and disseminates an effective learning design process as a core part of role
Communicates effectively across a broad range of mediums
Citeable (although the lions share of the credit must go to James York and Jonathan DeHaan.